Institutional Software · Industrial operations
Hitachi
Rail safety testing platform
A connected safety-testing platform brought data from onboard train computers into a shared operational view, cutting testing cycles from seven days to two across an international rail program.
The situation
Safety testing for train systems was distributed across 12 international rail lines, yet meaningful oversight still depended on being physically present. The tests ran against computers embedded onboard the trains, while the people responsible for monitoring progress needed a clear view from outside the vehicle and, in many cases, from another location entirely.
The gap between the onboard environment and the wider quality-assurance team made each testing cycle harder to coordinate. Progress was difficult to follow remotely, issues took longer to surface, and specialists could be sent on site simply to understand the state of a run. Any remote view had to preserve the accuracy and oversight expected of safety-critical work.
The mandate
Connect onboard testing data with a centralized monitoring experience so teams could follow safety-test progress across international rail lines without being physically present for every run.
Operating constraints
- Test status needed to remain accurate enough for safety-critical work.
- The software had to work with computers embedded onboard the trains and the established testing environment.
- The platform had to operate reliably across international sites.
- Digitization needed to fit established testing processes.
- On-site dependency had to fall without weakening oversight.
What 0.5 Labs did
0.5 Labs helped build a connected testing and monitoring platform spanning the onboard train computers, the test workflow, and a centralized operational dashboard. Data produced during safety tests was carried into a shared view that showed teams how each run was progressing across the 12 international rail lines.
The platform connected software running alongside embedded train hardware with the web interface used by engineers and quality-assurance teams. Onboard test activity became readable progress information outside the vehicle, allowing specialists to monitor multiple lines remotely, identify runs that required attention, and remain involved without travelling to every test location.
What changed
Engineers and quality-assurance teams could follow onboard testing activity without attending every run. Remote monitoring reduced the coordination needed across locations and helped surface progress and issues sooner. The testing cycle fell from seven days to two while safety teams retained the oversight needed to judge each run.
Relevant practices
Start the next engagement
Facing a similar operating problem?
A high-stakes decision, a system that has to run, or a product people have to use. We will help define the right mandate.